Form the modest beginnings of the United States History, our national forefathers and greatest national leaders have always advocated the importance of military education. It all started with Col. Henry Knox writing to John Adams, a congressman and then a future president, suggesting establishment of a military school to educate the young men and women in military arts, sciences and technology not withstanding regimented and disciplined training.
Henry Knox knew about the fact that Military schools were already a very well-established concept in European Countries: Prussian Cadet Corps Opened in Berlin to train officers in 1771; Russia was next to set up a military school in 1732; The British opened the Woolwich Artillery school in 1741; The French had founded their L’Ecole Militaire in Paris in 1751.
In the October month of 1776, the continental congress had appointed a committee, a coterie of 5 elite gentlemen to chalk out a plan for establishing a national military school and the rest – as they say – is history. Thousands of military schools have been established across the United States of America while churning out illustrious Alumni – Men and Women of high caliber, who have been able to move to magnanimous things all over the world and successfully at that.
The aftermaths of the Vietnam War had caused the popularity of the military schools to nosedive and the schools had to fight for those precious footfalls for admissions. However, things have changed now and there are often long queues lined up and waiting lists to clamber due to the every growing number of anxious parents willing to join their children into these redoubtable institutions.
It is a grave mistake if you were one of those who thought that Military schools were, well, Military. Now they are more modern in their approach and are just as academically oriented as any of their academic counter parts and aren’t just a repository for juvenile delinquents. Maybe they are the right answer to contemporary but mediocre public school education.
Military schools, apart from their newly acquired academic gleam, still manage to deliver the same public school education in a more controlled and disciplined atmosphere. That precisely is the reason why, these young men and women tumbling out of these institutions have a mark of self-respect, charm and sophistication along with high academic credentials earned through rigorous training, hard work, dedication and discipline – all of which is hard to replicate with the normal education systems.
Barney Garcia
http://www.articlesbase.com/education-articles/history-of-military-schools-76498.html
#1 by jbhafford on August 7th, 2009
Quote
Would Americans be better served if Military History and Military Science were taught in our public schools?
I think most people who are critical of the War are ignorant as to why we are fighting and whome we are fighting. If more people read history -especially Military History- and paid attention in history class, there would not be so many historically moronic insults levelled at America. For example, who stands to gain from the Democrats fearmongering and the media’s disinformation? Islam!
You don’t believe me? Pay attention, then, to Military Science:
1) The Art of War -Sun Stzu
2) The Prince -Macchiavelli
3) Isinde Al Qaeda -Mohamed Sifaoui
If you can comprehend these monumental works, then your eyes will be opened.
#2 by Cheech on August 7th, 2009
Quote
i believe so. i love that stuff. I think it would be better for us to avoid war, or if we are engaged in war, to be better prepared for battle, where even a low level grunt, or minor officer would be better prepared through the years in bits of military strategy to keep his troops alive.
References :
#3 by jaijay15 on August 7th, 2009
Quote
military history is taught through us history in high school (espically in ap us history). as far as military science is concerned, unless it was taught as a class that studied different countries as well as the us, it wouldn’t be effective.
References :
i took and passed ap us history (basically college freshman history.).
#4 by mikehunt on August 7th, 2009
Quote
yes
References :
#5 by sage on August 7th, 2009
Quote
You raise a very good point, but I think it should be taken a step further to recognize that the general history we teach in schools currently is at best inaccurate and boring. Not only that, but it stops just shy of discussing any of the wars or political ideologies behind them in recent history. This blatant omission of all wars fought post WWII and the reasons behind them has left our whole society with virtually no understanding of the state of the world.
Yes, I think we should be teaching military history, political history and recent and current events, also a course on ideologies. First, we need to tell the truth in what we are teaching currently. For example, get Chris Colombus off his pedestal, he was a genocidal, tortuous pedophile who started slavery in the "New World." What kind of people are we that we celebrate such a creature?
References :
"Lies My Teacher Told Me" by: James Loewen
#6 by WomanWhoReads on August 7th, 2009
Quote
You’re curious about military history & how to win?
Good points : )
I would add another example … if I may.
"Muhammad turned to raiding caravans bound for Mecca. Caravan-raiding was an old Arabian tradition and according to Watt was "a kind of sport rather than war" and that the object of the raids was to take animals and other goods but killing was carefully avoided.
Muslims justified the raids by the Meccans’ confiscation of the property they had left at Mecca and the state of war deemed to exist between the Meccans and the Muslims.
In March of 624, Muhammad led some three hundred warriors in a raid on a Meccan merchant caravan. The Meccans successfully defended the caravan and then decided to teach the Medinans a lesson. They sent a small army against Medina. On March 15, 624 near a place called Badr, the Meccans and the Muslims clashed. Though outnumbered more than three times (one thousand to three hundred) in the battle, the Muslims met with success, killing at least forty-five Meccans and taking seventy prisoners for ransom; only fourteen Muslims died. This marked the real beginning of Muslim military achievement."
References :
#7 by aka DarthDad on August 7th, 2009
Quote
I was tempted to write a flippant "they sure should teach something remark"
Seriously,
First you will need qualified teachers to put military history and the modern era in perspective. This would require a level of understanding beyond that which is taught in middle or high school levels.
But i think you idea is otherwise sound. Too much is taught about how things ought to be in some idealized way, and not how things are in the real world.
Political and religious conflict is just economic warfare disguised.
References :
#8 by mudmarine on August 7th, 2009
Quote
The LIBERALS run the schools and we’ll never get military history taught while they do .
Great idea but hard to do at this time .
References :
History 101
#9 by arunmadav2013 on August 7th, 2009
Quote
Absolutely not!! I am Indian and am living in the U.S. I am 13 and am an honors student. I will not be a pupil who has to spend time in school listening to some American patriotism and propaganda.
I don’t care about what really happens to the U.S. The U.S thinks
its right to invade other countries and rape woman but I am Indian. My country is a future super power and I care about
their developments. America is starting to bug other countries and tell them to close their nuclier weapons program when
America has the most nukes to start off. If America really ticks some country off they will pay for it and the time is coming.
References :